From e4c94e86f1c6330de01f765ed79e5edf2e2f7a9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Glanzmann Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:56:21 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] notes on geekbench --- doc/notes.txt | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/notes.txt b/doc/notes.txt index 5fbe8b9..c67bf52 100644 --- a/doc/notes.txt +++ b/doc/notes.txt @@ -423,3 +423,17 @@ https://gist.github.com/rqou/2dafd40cfe0362cc84c3ee26c68b2b36 https://arvanta.net/alpine/install-alpine-m1/ 21:48 < mps> Glanzmann: no, but /etc/local.d/$scriptname.start + +# geekbench +16:08 looks like theres some results https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/13927518 +16:09 https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=asahi +16:10 jannau: https://www.geekbench.com/blog/2021/03/geekbench-54/ +16:14 jannau: same m1 16 gb, 3000 more in multicore. How? https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/13856349 +16:18 jannau: does it matter? I mean, it looks like we do have geekbench on arm linux... +16:19 https://www.geekbench.com/blog/2021/03/geekbench-54/ +16:24 https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/12429267 +16:25 the multicore test doesn't scale well, here are results from a m1 ultra: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/13932507 +16:31 Chainfire: it's geekbench issue. kernel compiles are on the m1 ultra twice as fast as on the m1 max + +my air: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/13933197 +my mini: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/13933401 -- 2.39.2