+
+15:49 < j`ey> https://github.com/AsahiLinux/asahi-installer/blob/main/src/osinstall.py#L141
+15:49 < j`ey> cat m1n1.bin <(echo 'chainload=$ESP_UUID;$BOOT_OBJ_PATH') > blah.bin
+
+16:43 < povik> marcan: two fixes on top of 'asahi' that should make it into the release: https://github.com/povik/linux/commits/asahi-fixes
+
+# boot into 1tr
+diskutil list
+diskutil info <identifier of esp>
+curl -sLo tg.st/u/m1n1-rust.bin
+cat m1n1-rust.bin <(echo 'chainload=<ESP Partition UUID>;m1n1/boot.bin') <(echo 'chosen.asahi,efi-system-partition=<ESP Parition UUID>') > object.bin
+kmutil configure-boot -c object.bin --raw --entry-point 2048 --lowest-virtual-address 0 -v /Volumes/Linux
+
+20:29 < Glanzmann> One question though what is difference between chosen.asahi,efi-system-partition=EFI-PARTITION-PARTUUID and chainload=EFI-PARTITION-PARTUUID;m1n1/boot.bin?
+20:30 < jannau> chainload tell's the 1st stage m1n1 from where to load the second stage
+20:31 < jannau> chosen.asahi,efi-system-partition is added to the dt mostly to allow u-boot to boot from the correct ESP
+20:32 < Glanzmann> I see. Thank you for the elaboration.
+20:32 < jannau> chosen.asahi,efi-system-partition is passed from the 1st stage forward to the second stage
+20:33 < Glanzmann> I see, so the first stage informs the second stage about the uuid of the esp partition which is than passed using dt to u-boot which can than select the right esp to select the efi binary.
+
+17:25 < Jamie[m]1> I had a dumb idea and had to implement it: using http range requests and DEFLATE trickery to download Wifi firmware from Apple's CDN with only 18MB of transfer (out of a 13GB ipsw) http://github.com/JJJollyjim/firmware-abomination
+
+23:23 <@jannau> Glanzmann: on the mini vram can fit 5.5 million pixels, would be good for 3440x1600 or 3840x1433 at 32bpp
+
+11:37 < AdryzzOLEDEdition[m]> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2021-03/msg01260.html
+
+https://gist.github.com/rqou/2dafd40cfe0362cc84c3ee26c68b2b36
+
+https://arvanta.net/alpine/install-alpine-m1/
+21:48 < mps> Glanzmann: no, but /etc/local.d/$scriptname.start
+
+# geekbench
+16:08 <j`ey> looks like theres some results https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/13927518
+16:09 <j`ey> https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=asahi
+16:10 <j`ey> jannau: https://www.geekbench.com/blog/2021/03/geekbench-54/
+16:14 <bluetail[m]> jannau: same m1 16 gb, 3000 more in multicore. How? https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/13856349
+16:18 <bluetail[m]> jannau: does it matter? I mean, it looks like we do have geekbench on arm linux...
+16:19 <bluetail[m]> https://www.geekbench.com/blog/2021/03/geekbench-54/
+16:24 <psydroid[m]1> https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/12429267
+16:25 <jannau> the multicore test doesn't scale well, here are results from a m1 ultra: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/13932507
+16:31 <jannau> Chainfire: it's geekbench issue. kernel compiles are on the m1 ultra twice as fast as on the m1 max
+
+my air: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/13933197
+my mini: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/13933401
+
+15:58 < kov> Glanzmann, jannau out of curiosity I ran geekbench on my Fedora VM under MacOS (M1 Max - 8 vcpus) https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/13951703